Was it not necessary (ἔδει)? A reflection on the inevitability of the slaughter of the Lamb

“Was it not necessary (ἔδει)that Messiah should suffer?” —Luke 24:26

In the incarnation of Jesus, God took on flesh and dwelt among us as a human being. Other human beings slaughtered him, and thus we refer to him as “the Lamb of God.” When we use a theology that says “it was necessary,” we are ignoring the large systems of human violence done every day to other innocent human beings. Often, this violence is even done in the name of justice. This kind of “it was necessary” theology supports systems of violent domination.

If, however, God had taken on the flesh of an actual lamb, a vulnerable young sheep without a voice of her own to ask for clemency, without the capacity to rebuke us when we transgress against her, even without the agency to repay us for our kindness toward her, perhaps we would have seen a bit clearer the truth of the evil that brought about the death of God. We would know then that the death of the Prophet, the crucifixion of Christ, the slaughtering of the Lamb, is not *necessary* given the character of God; it is, however, *inevitable* given the character of our human systems of Domination.

“Was it not necessary (ἔδει) that Messiah should suffer?”
No! It was, however, inevitable (ἔδει).

For More Reading:

1. Matthew Scully, Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy (St. Martin’s Press: New York, 2002).

One Comment Add yours

  1. Amanda says:

    Anyone who deems suffering necessary when they don’t have to is a twisted individual

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s